On the relationship between degree of hand-preference and degree of language lateralization

  • Metten Somers
  • , Roel A Ophoff
  • , Marco P Boks
  • , Willemien Fleer
  • , Kees C L de Visser
  • , René S Kahn
  • , Iris E Sommer
  • , M.F. Aukes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Language lateralization and hand-preference show inter-individual variation in the degree of lateralization to the left- or right, but their relation is not fully understood. Disentangling this relation could aid elucidating the mechanisms underlying these traits. The relation between degree of language lateralization and degree of hand-preference was investigated in extended pedigrees with multi-generational left-handedness (n=310). Language lateralization was measured with functional Transcranial Doppler, hand-preference with the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Degree of hand-preference did not mirror degree of language lateralization. Instead, the prevalence of right-hemispheric and bilateral language lateralization rises with increasing strength of left-handedness. Degree of hand-preference does not predict degree of language lateralization, thus refuting genetic models in which one mechanism defines both hand-preference and language lateralization. Instead, our findings suggest a model in which increasing strength of left-handedness is associated with increased variation in directionality of cerebral dominance.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)10-5
    Number of pages6
    JournalBrain and Language
    Volume144
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Keywords

    • Dominance, Cerebral
    • Female
    • Functional Laterality
    • Humans
    • Language
    • Male
    • Models, Neurological

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On the relationship between degree of hand-preference and degree of language lateralization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this