Abstract
Abstract: An intuitive objection to modal realism is that merely possible worlds and their inhabitants seem to be irrelevant to an analysis of modality. Kripke originally phrased the objection in terms of being concerned about one's modal properties without being concerned about the properties one's other-worldly counterparts have. I assess this objection in a variety of forms, and then provide my own formulation that does not beg the question against the modal realist. Finally, I consider two potential answers to the objection so understood and conclude that only one of them has a chance of succeeding.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 159-179 |
| Journal | Grazer Philosophische Studien |
| Volume | 95 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- modal realism
- modality
- Humphrey objection