On measure phrase alternation and smuggling

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter examines the phenomenon of M(easure) P(hrase) alternation from a cross-categorial perspective. An illustration of this phenomenon is given by the minimal pair (i) John is two inches too tall; (ii) John is too tall by two inches. The former features a bare MP, the latter by+MP. Interestingly, clauses permit only one order: *Mary two years outlived her husband; (ii) Mary outlived her husband by two years. It is proposed that the pattern featuring the bare MP is the base order. The pattern featuring by+MP is the derived order. This derived order results from leftward movement of a phrasal constituent past MP. In clauses, this phrasal constituent is a VP which smuggles the subject across MP. The ill-formedness of the clause featuring a bare MP is due to a locality violation: a subject moves across an intervening MP. In non-clausal configurations, this violation does not occur since the (small clause) subject is located higher than MP.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationSmuggling in Syntax
    EditorsAdriana Belletti, Chris Collins
    PublisherOxford University Press
    Pages108-146
    ISBN (Print)9780197509869
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2021

    Keywords

    • measure phrase alternation
    • smuggling
    • Relativized Minimality
    • comparison
    • silent P
    • small clause
    • DegP movement

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On measure phrase alternation and smuggling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this