Abstract
In this paper I want to explore reasons for replacing Binding
Theory based on the anaphor-pronoun dichotomy by a Binding
Theory allowing more domains restricting/defining anaphoric
dependencies. This will, thus, have consequences for the
partitioning of anaphoric elements, presupposing more types of
‘anaphors’/‘pronouns’ than standard Binding Theory offers us
| Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar |
| Editors | S. Müller |
| Place of Publication | Stanford |
| Publisher | CSLI |
| Pages | 503-518 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Keywords
- Wiskunde en computerwetenschappen
- Menswetenschappen
- Linguistic theory
- Applied linguistics