@article{88efa440d658493885053a7ebabcff8b,
title = "Old Tools for the New Economy? Counterfactual Causation in Foreclosure Assessment and Choice of Remedies on Data-driven Markets",
abstract = "Under the Digital Markets Act, gatekeeper platforms abide by numerous ex-ante rules, including narrow data-sharing obligations that address data-driven market tipping. Gatekeepers also remain subject to ex-post competition interventions. While interventions under both ex-ante and ex-post (antitrust) mandates are not novel, they must be approached with extra care in data-driven digital markets, where uncertainty and error costs are high. Therefore, we argue that post-DMA competition enforcement against gatekeepers requires rigorous ex-post economic effects analysis at two levels: foreclosure assessment and devising appropriate remedies. Regarding foreclosure assessment, we propose a {\textquoteleft}multiple-counterfactual-causation-test{\textquoteright} for establishing anticompetitive effects, which should ensure a nuanced analysis of the competitive landscape on data-driven digital markets in the post-DMA world. Regarding remedies, a fine-grained, proportionality-driven assessment of the need for ex-post data-related obligations is vital.",
keywords = "competition, regulation, data-driven markets, remedies, causation, counterfactuals, DMA",
author = "{von Ingersleben-Seip}, Nora and Z.R. Georgieva",
year = "2024",
month = aug,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1093/jaenfo/jnae042",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Antitrust Enforcement",
issn = "2050-0696",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
}