Abstract
Foreign direct liability litigation against businesses is still a growing trend in European domestic courts, going on for over two decades. With absent effective remedies in host states, victims of human rights abuses committed by transnational corporations' subsidiaries try to get access to remedy in the courts of the home states of the parent companies. A crucial factor for whether such cases can succeed, is the viability of the claims against the parent companies allegedly involved in the abuses. The principal legal route that victims have used to hold parent companies liable is through common law negligence claims.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 368-376 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Business and Human Rights Journal |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Funding statement: This article was not funded by third parties.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.
Funding
Funding statement: This article was not funded by third parties.
Keywords
- duty of care
- negligence
- Nigeria
- Okpabi
- parent company
- Shell
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Okpabi v Shell and Four Nigerian Farmers v Shell: Parent Company Liability Back in Court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver