Abstract
The response to Markus Altena Davidsen’s article ‘Theo van Baaren’s Systematic Science of Religion Revisited: The Current Crisis in Dutch Study of Religion and a Way Out’ analyses the image of anthropology depicted in the article. It delineates the role anthropology plays in formulating Davidsen’s vision for a new disciplinary identity and research agenda of a ‘science of reli- gion’. The response further questions if reanimating a research program from the mid-20th century is indeed the way forward for the discipline. The last part will discuss different views of comparison and its role in research on religion at large.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 253-262 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | NTT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion |
| Volume | 74 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2020 |
Keywords
- anthropolgoy
- the study of religion
- comparison
- poststructuralism
- postcolonialism
- feminist critique
- disciplinary identity
- diversity
- heterogenous discipline
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Of Bogeymen and The Promises of The Past o How To Construct a Uniform Identity: A Response to Markus Davidsen'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver