Abstract
The response to Markus Altena Davidsen’s article ‘Theo van Baaren’s Systematic Science of Religion Revisited: The Current Crisis in Dutch Study of Religion and a Way Out’ analyses the image of anthropology depicted in the article. It delineates the role anthropology plays in formulating Davidsen’s vision for a new disciplinary identity and research agenda of a ‘science of reli- gion’. The response further questions if reanimating a research program from the mid-20th century is indeed the way forward for the discipline. The last part will discuss different views of comparison and its role in research on religion at large.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 253-262 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | NTT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion |
Volume | 74 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2020 |
Keywords
- anthropolgoy
- the study of religion
- comparison
- poststructuralism
- postcolonialism
- feminist critique
- disciplinary identity
- diversity
- heterogenous discipline