TY - JOUR
T1 - Occupational prestige, social mobility and the association with lung cancer in men
AU - Behrens, Thomas
AU - Groß, Isabelle
AU - Siemiatycki, Jack
AU - Conway, David I
AU - Olsson, Ann
AU - Stücker, Isabelle
AU - Guida, Florence
AU - Jöckel, Karl-Heinz
AU - Pohlabeln, Hermann
AU - Ahrens, Wolfgang
AU - Brüske, Irene
AU - Wichmann, Heinz-Erich
AU - Gustavsson, Per
AU - Consonni, Dario
AU - Merletti, Franco
AU - Richiardi, Lorenzo
AU - Simonato, Lorenzo
AU - Fortes, Cristina
AU - Parent, Marie-Elise
AU - McLaughlin, John
AU - Demers, Paul
AU - Landi, Maria Teresa
AU - Caporaso, Neil
AU - Zaridze, David
AU - Szeszenia-Dabrowska, Neonila
AU - Rudnai, Peter
AU - Lissowska, Jolanta
AU - Fabianova, Eleonora
AU - Tardón, Adonina
AU - Field, John K
AU - Dumitru, Rodica Stanescu
AU - Bencko, Vladimir
AU - Foretova, Lenka
AU - Janout, Vladimir
AU - Kromhout, Hans
AU - Vermeulen, Roel
AU - Boffetta, Paolo
AU - Straif, Kurt
AU - Schüz, Joachim
AU - Hovanec, Jan
AU - Kendzia, Benjamin
AU - Pesch, Beate
AU - Brüning, Thomas
PY - 2016/7/7
Y1 - 2016/7/7
N2 - BACKGROUND: The nature of the association between occupational social prestige, social mobility, and risk of lung cancer remains uncertain. Using data from the international pooled SYNERGY case-control study, we studied the association between lung cancer and the level of time-weighted average occupational social prestige as well as its lifetime trajectory.METHODS: We included 11,433 male cases and 14,147 male control subjects. Each job was translated into an occupational social prestige score by applying Treiman's Standard International Occupational Prestige Scale (SIOPS). SIOPS scores were categorized as low, medium, and high prestige (reference). We calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for study center, age, smoking, ever employment in a job with known lung carcinogen exposure, and education. Trajectories in SIOPS categories from first to last and first to longest job were defined as consistent, downward, or upward. We conducted several subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our results.RESULTS: We observed increased lung cancer risk estimates for men with medium (OR = 1.23; 95 % CI 1.13-1.33) and low occupational prestige (OR = 1.44; 95 % CI 1.32-1.57). Although adjustment for smoking and education reduced the associations between occupational prestige and lung cancer, they did not explain the association entirely. Traditional occupational exposures reduced the associations only slightly. We observed small associations with downward prestige trajectories, with ORs of 1.13, 95 % CI 0.88-1.46 for high to low, and 1.24; 95 % CI 1.08-1.41 for medium to low trajectories.CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that occupational prestige is independently associated with lung cancer among men.
AB - BACKGROUND: The nature of the association between occupational social prestige, social mobility, and risk of lung cancer remains uncertain. Using data from the international pooled SYNERGY case-control study, we studied the association between lung cancer and the level of time-weighted average occupational social prestige as well as its lifetime trajectory.METHODS: We included 11,433 male cases and 14,147 male control subjects. Each job was translated into an occupational social prestige score by applying Treiman's Standard International Occupational Prestige Scale (SIOPS). SIOPS scores were categorized as low, medium, and high prestige (reference). We calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for study center, age, smoking, ever employment in a job with known lung carcinogen exposure, and education. Trajectories in SIOPS categories from first to last and first to longest job were defined as consistent, downward, or upward. We conducted several subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our results.RESULTS: We observed increased lung cancer risk estimates for men with medium (OR = 1.23; 95 % CI 1.13-1.33) and low occupational prestige (OR = 1.44; 95 % CI 1.32-1.57). Although adjustment for smoking and education reduced the associations between occupational prestige and lung cancer, they did not explain the association entirely. Traditional occupational exposures reduced the associations only slightly. We observed small associations with downward prestige trajectories, with ORs of 1.13, 95 % CI 0.88-1.46 for high to low, and 1.24; 95 % CI 1.08-1.41 for medium to low trajectories.CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that occupational prestige is independently associated with lung cancer among men.
KW - Life course
KW - occupational history
KW - social prestige
KW - socio-economic status
KW - SYNERGY
KW - transitions
U2 - 10.1186/s12885-016-2432-9
DO - 10.1186/s12885-016-2432-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 27388894
SN - 1471-2407
VL - 16
JO - BMC Cancer
JF - BMC Cancer
M1 - 395
ER -