Occupational prestige, social mobility and the association with lung cancer in men

Thomas Behrens, Isabelle Groß, Jack Siemiatycki, David I Conway, Ann Olsson, Isabelle Stücker, Florence Guida, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Hermann Pohlabeln, Wolfgang Ahrens, Irene Brüske, Heinz-Erich Wichmann, Per Gustavsson, Dario Consonni, Franco Merletti, Lorenzo Richiardi, Lorenzo Simonato, Cristina Fortes, Marie-Elise Parent, John McLaughlinPaul Demers, Maria Teresa Landi, Neil Caporaso, David Zaridze, Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska, Peter Rudnai, Jolanta Lissowska, Eleonora Fabianova, Adonina Tardón, John K Field, Rodica Stanescu Dumitru, Vladimir Bencko, Lenka Foretova, Vladimir Janout, Hans Kromhout, Roel Vermeulen, Paolo Boffetta, Kurt Straif, Joachim Schüz, Jan Hovanec, Benjamin Kendzia, Beate Pesch, Thomas Brüning

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: The nature of the association between occupational social prestige, social mobility, and risk of lung cancer remains uncertain. Using data from the international pooled SYNERGY case-control study, we studied the association between lung cancer and the level of time-weighted average occupational social prestige as well as its lifetime trajectory.

    METHODS: We included 11,433 male cases and 14,147 male control subjects. Each job was translated into an occupational social prestige score by applying Treiman's Standard International Occupational Prestige Scale (SIOPS). SIOPS scores were categorized as low, medium, and high prestige (reference). We calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for study center, age, smoking, ever employment in a job with known lung carcinogen exposure, and education. Trajectories in SIOPS categories from first to last and first to longest job were defined as consistent, downward, or upward. We conducted several subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our results.

    RESULTS: We observed increased lung cancer risk estimates for men with medium (OR = 1.23; 95 % CI 1.13-1.33) and low occupational prestige (OR = 1.44; 95 % CI 1.32-1.57). Although adjustment for smoking and education reduced the associations between occupational prestige and lung cancer, they did not explain the association entirely. Traditional occupational exposures reduced the associations only slightly. We observed small associations with downward prestige trajectories, with ORs of 1.13, 95 % CI 0.88-1.46 for high to low, and 1.24; 95 % CI 1.08-1.41 for medium to low trajectories.

    CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that occupational prestige is independently associated with lung cancer among men.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number395
    Number of pages12
    JournalBMC Cancer
    Volume16
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 7 Jul 2016

    Keywords

    • Life course
    • occupational history
    • social prestige
    • socio-economic status
    • SYNERGY
    • transitions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Occupational prestige, social mobility and the association with lung cancer in men'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this