Negative Affect as a Justification for Overeating

Sosja Prinsen, Catharine Evers, Jessie de Witt Huberts, Denise de Ridder

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting AbstractOther research output

Abstract

Background: Self-regulatory conflicts involve choosing between immediate gratification (chocolate) and adhering to long term goals (a slim figure). Just like compensatory health beliefs, justifications are used to resolve such conflicts so that temporary abandonment of the long term goal is made acceptable for oneself. We examined if negative affect can serve as a justification for overeating. Methods: Ninety female students participated in a lab study. Aversive pictures were shown for a longer vs. shorter duration (strong vs. weak affective recall condition). Affect was measured at baseline and after the presentation of the pictures. Next, unhealthy food intake was measured in a bogus taste test. Findings: Although participants in both conditions experienced negative affect equally intensely, participants in the strong affective recall condition memorized more aversive pictures and ate more unhealthy foods compared to participants in the weak affective recall condition. Discussion: These findings suggest that negative affect can serve as a justification to overeat. Also, identifying different justification types is of vital importance for understanding health behavior.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319
Number of pages1
JournalThe European Health Psychologist
Volume16
Issue numberSupp
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2014

Keywords

  • justification
  • emotion
  • negative affect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Negative Affect as a Justification for Overeating'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this