Abstract
There are two problems with the comment of Thiem about necessary
condition analysis (NCA): First, it is based on wrong assumptions about what
NCA aims to do. Second, it applies NCA incorrectly. These are critical
errors such that the comment’s conclusions about NCA are flawed. Contrary
to what the comment states, NCA is a valid method for identifying
necessary conditions.
condition analysis (NCA): First, it is based on wrong assumptions about what
NCA aims to do. Second, it applies NCA incorrectly. These are critical
errors such that the comment’s conclusions about NCA are flawed. Contrary
to what the comment states, NCA is a valid method for identifying
necessary conditions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 926-936 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Sociological Methods and Research |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2018.
Keywords
- correct application of NCA
- goals of NCA
- necessary condition analysis (NCA)
- necessary conditions
- reply to a comment