National post-2020 greenhouse gas targets and diversity-aware leadership

Malte Meinshausen*, Louise Jeffery, Johannes Guetschow, Yann Robiou Du Pont, Joeri Rogelj, Michiel Schaeffer, Niklas Höhne, Michel Den Elzen, Sebastian Oberthür, Nicolai Meinshausen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Achieving the collective goal of limiting warming to below 2°C or 1.5°C compared to pre-industrial levels requires a transition towards a fully decarbonized world. Annual greenhouse gas emissions on such a path in 2025 or 2030 can be allocated to individual countries using a variety of allocation schemes. We reanalyse the IPCC literature allocation database and provide country-level details for three approaches. At this stage, however, it seems utopian to assume that the international community will agree on a single allocation scheme. Here, we investigate an approach that involves a major-economy country taking the lead. In a bottom-up manner, other countries then determine what they consider a fair comparable target, for example, either a 'per-capita convergence' or 'equal cumulative per-capita' approach. For example, we find that a 2030 target of 67% below 1990 for the EU28, a 2025 target of 54% below 2005 for the USA or a 2030 target of 32% below 2010 for China could secure a likely chance of meeting the 2°C target in our illustrative default case. Comparing those targets to post-2020 mitigation targets reveals a large gap. No major emitter can at present claim to show the necessary leadership in the concerted effort of avoiding warming of 2°C in a diverse global context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1098-1106
Number of pages9
JournalNature Climate Change
Volume5
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'National post-2020 greenhouse gas targets and diversity-aware leadership'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this