N-to-D movement within compounds and phrases. Referential compounding, -s- possessives and title expressions in Dutch.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Noun–noun concatenations can differ along two parameters. They can be compounds, i.e., single words, or constructs, i.e., constituents, and they can have modificational non-heads or referential non-heads. Of the four logical possibilities, one was argued not to exist: compounds of which the non-head is referential were considered to be principally excluded. In this article, I argue that Dutch has compounds with a referential non-head. They resemble the Dutch s-possessive in that their non-heads involve movement to a referential layer. However, unlike the possessive structures, the compounding structure contains head incorporation which results in word-hood. The article further discusses title expressions, such as Prince Charles, which are argued to be referential construct states. Together with the syntactic structure of titles plus proper names, the referential compounds further contribute evidence to the idea that a ban on N-to-D movement for certain uniquely referring roots, such as sun and Bronx, is extra-syntactic.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number304
    Number of pages27
    JournalLanguages
    Volume7
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

    Bibliographical note

    Funding Information:
    This research receives no external funding.

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2022 by the author.

    Keywords

    • compounding
    • Dutch
    • construct state
    • N-to-D movement
    • possessives

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'N-to-D movement within compounds and phrases. Referential compounding, -s- possessives and title expressions in Dutch.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this