Mutation and recombination in cattle satellite DNA: A feedback model for the evolution of satellite DNA repeats

Isaäc J. Nijman, Johannes A. Lenstra*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The cattle genome contains several distinct centromeric satellites with interrelated evolutionary histories. We compared these satellites in Bovini species that diverged 0.2 to about 5 Myr ago. Quantification of hybridization signals by phosphor imaging revealed a large variation in the relative amounts of the major satellites. In the genome of water buffalo this has led to the complete deletion of satellite III. Comparative sequencing and PCR-RFLP analysis of satellites IV, 1.711 a, and 1.711b from the related Bos and Bison species revealed heterogeneities in 0.5 to 2% of the positions, again with variations in the relative amounts of sequence variants. Restriction patterns generated by double digestions suggested a recombination of sequence variants. Our results are compatible with a model of the life history of satellites during which homogeneity of interacting repeat units is both cause and consequence of the rapid turnover of satellite DNA. Initially, a positive feedback loop leads to a rapid saltatory amplification of homogeneous repeat units. In the second phase, mutations inhibit the interaction of repeat units and coexisting sequence variants amplify independently. Homogenization by the spreading of one of the variants is prevented by recombination and the satellite is eventually outcompeted by another, more homogeneous tandem repeat sequence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)361-371
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Molecular Evolution
Volume52
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 5 May 2001

Keywords

  • Bovini
  • Cattle
  • Concerted evolution
  • Satellite DNA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mutation and recombination in cattle satellite DNA: A feedback model for the evolution of satellite DNA repeats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this