TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiverse analyses in fear conditioning research
AU - Lonsdorf, T.B.
AU - Gerlicher, A.M.V.
AU - Klingelhöfer-Jens, M.
AU - Krypotos, A.M.
N1 - Funding Information:
TBL was funded through grants awarded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) DFG LO1980/7-1 , DFG LO1980/4-1 , DFG LO1980/2-1 , and DFG CRC TRR 58 INST 211/633-2 . AMK is supported by a senior post-doctoral grant from FWO (Reg. # 12X5320N ) and a replication grant from NWO (Reg. # 401.18.056 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - There is heterogeneity in and a lack of consensus on the preferred statistical analyses in light of a multitude of potentially equally justifiable approaches. Here, we introduce multiverse analysis for the field of experimental psychopathology research. We present a model multiverse approach tailored to fear conditioning research and, as a secondary aim, introduce the R package ‘multifear’ that allows to run all the models though a single line of code. Model specifications and data reduction approaches were identified through a systematic literature search. The heterogeneity of statistical models identified included Bayesian ANOVA and t-tests as well as frequentist ANOVA, t-test as well as mixed models with a variety of data reduction approaches. We illustrate the power of a multiverse analysis for fear conditioning data based on two pre-existing data sets with partial (data set 1) and 100% reinforcement rate (data set 2) by using CS discrimination in skin conductance responses (SCRs) during fear acquisition and extinction training as case examples. Both the effect size and the direction of effect was impacted by choice of the model and data reduction techniques. We anticipate that an increase in multiverse-type of studies will aid the development of formal theories through the accumulation of empirical evidence and ultimately aid clinical translation.
AB - There is heterogeneity in and a lack of consensus on the preferred statistical analyses in light of a multitude of potentially equally justifiable approaches. Here, we introduce multiverse analysis for the field of experimental psychopathology research. We present a model multiverse approach tailored to fear conditioning research and, as a secondary aim, introduce the R package ‘multifear’ that allows to run all the models though a single line of code. Model specifications and data reduction approaches were identified through a systematic literature search. The heterogeneity of statistical models identified included Bayesian ANOVA and t-tests as well as frequentist ANOVA, t-test as well as mixed models with a variety of data reduction approaches. We illustrate the power of a multiverse analysis for fear conditioning data based on two pre-existing data sets with partial (data set 1) and 100% reinforcement rate (data set 2) by using CS discrimination in skin conductance responses (SCRs) during fear acquisition and extinction training as case examples. Both the effect size and the direction of effect was impacted by choice of the model and data reduction techniques. We anticipate that an increase in multiverse-type of studies will aid the development of formal theories through the accumulation of empirical evidence and ultimately aid clinical translation.
KW - Anxiety disorders
KW - Good research practices
KW - p-hacking
KW - Questionable research practices
KW - Transparency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127393808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104072
DO - 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104072
M3 - Article
C2 - 35500540
AN - SCOPUS:85127393808
SN - 0005-7967
VL - 153
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - Behaviour Research and Therapy
JF - Behaviour Research and Therapy
M1 - 104072
ER -