TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple pathways towards sustainable development goals and climate targets
AU - Soergel, Bjoern
AU - Rauner, Sebastian
AU - Daioglou, Vassilis
AU - Weindl, Isabelle
AU - Mastrucci, Alessio
AU - Carrer, Fabio
AU - Kikstra, Jarmo
AU - Ambrósio, Geanderson
AU - Aguiar, Ana Paula Dutra
AU - Baumstark, Lavinia
AU - Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon
AU - Bos, Astrid
AU - Dietrich, Jan Philipp
AU - Dirnaichner, Alois
AU - Doelman, Jonathan C.
AU - Hasse, Robin
AU - Hernandez, Ariel
AU - Hoppe, Johanna
AU - Humpenöder, Florian
AU - Iacobuţă, Gabriela Ileana
AU - Keppler, Dorothee
AU - Koch, Johannes
AU - Luderer, Gunnar
AU - Lotze-Campen, Hermann
AU - Pehl, Michaja
AU - Poblete-Cazenave, Miguel
AU - Popp, Alexander
AU - Remy, Merle
AU - van Zeist, Willem Jan
AU - Cornell, Sarah
AU - Dombrowsky, Ines
AU - Hertwich, Edgar G.
AU - Schmidt, Falk
AU - van Ruijven, Bas
AU - van Vuuren, Detlef
AU - Kriegler, Elmar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
PY - 2024/12/1
Y1 - 2024/12/1
N2 - The UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the Paris climate target require a holistic transformation towards human well-being within planetary boundaries. However, there are growing debates on how to best pursue these targets. Proposed transformation strategies include market- and technology-driven green-growth, shifting towards a sufficiency-oriented post-growth economy, and a transformation driven primarily by strong government action. Here we quantify three alternative sustainable development pathways (SDPs), Economy-driven Innovation, Resilient Communities, and Managing the Global Commons, that reflect these different societal strategies. We compare the quantifications from two integrated assessment models and two sectoral models of the buildings and materials sectors across a broad set of indicators for sustainable development and climate action. Our global multi-scenario and multi-model analysis shows that all three SDPs enable substantial progress towards the human development goals of the SDGs. They simultaneously limit global warming and prevent further environmental degradation, with the sufficiency-oriented Resilient Communities scenario showing the lowest peak warming and lowest reliance on carbon dioxide removal as well as the largest improvements in biodiversity intactness. The SDPs also alleviate the concerns about the biogeophysical and technological feasibility of narrowly-focused climate change mitigation scenarios. However, the shifts in energy and food consumption patterns assumed in the SDPs, ranging from moderate in Economy-driven Innovation to very ambitious in Resilient Communities, also lead to increased challenges regarding socio-cultural feasibility.
AB - The UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the Paris climate target require a holistic transformation towards human well-being within planetary boundaries. However, there are growing debates on how to best pursue these targets. Proposed transformation strategies include market- and technology-driven green-growth, shifting towards a sufficiency-oriented post-growth economy, and a transformation driven primarily by strong government action. Here we quantify three alternative sustainable development pathways (SDPs), Economy-driven Innovation, Resilient Communities, and Managing the Global Commons, that reflect these different societal strategies. We compare the quantifications from two integrated assessment models and two sectoral models of the buildings and materials sectors across a broad set of indicators for sustainable development and climate action. Our global multi-scenario and multi-model analysis shows that all three SDPs enable substantial progress towards the human development goals of the SDGs. They simultaneously limit global warming and prevent further environmental degradation, with the sufficiency-oriented Resilient Communities scenario showing the lowest peak warming and lowest reliance on carbon dioxide removal as well as the largest improvements in biodiversity intactness. The SDPs also alleviate the concerns about the biogeophysical and technological feasibility of narrowly-focused climate change mitigation scenarios. However, the shifts in energy and food consumption patterns assumed in the SDPs, ranging from moderate in Economy-driven Innovation to very ambitious in Resilient Communities, also lead to increased challenges regarding socio-cultural feasibility.
KW - climate change mitigation
KW - green growth
KW - integrated assessment models
KW - post growth
KW - sustainable development goals
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208287467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1748-9326/ad80af
DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/ad80af
M3 - Letter
AN - SCOPUS:85208287467
SN - 1748-9326
VL - 19
JO - Environmental Research Letters
JF - Environmental Research Letters
IS - 12
M1 - 124009
ER -