Multi‐decadal coastline dynamics in Suriname controlled by migrating subtidal mudbanks

Job de Vries, Barend Maanen, Gerben Ruessink, Pita A. Verweij, Steven de Jong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

For the development of climate-resilient coastal management strategies, which focus on challenges in the decades to come, it is critical to incorporate spatial and temporal variability of coastline changes. This is particularly true for the mud-dominated coastline of Suriname, part of the Guianas, where migrating subtidal mudbanks cause a cyclic instability of erosion and accretion of the coast that can be directly related to interbank and bank phases. The coastline hosts extensive mangrove forests, providing valuable ecosystem services to local communities. Recent studies on mudbank dynamics in Suriname predominantly focused on large-scale trends without accounting for local variability, or on local changes considering the dynamics of a single mudbank over relatively short time scales. Here we use a remote sensing approach, with sufficient spatial and temporal resolution and full spatial and temporal coverage, to quantify the influence of mudbank migration on spatiotemporal coastline dynamics along the entire coast of Suriname.

We show that migration of six to eight subtidal mudbanks in front of the Suriname coast has a strong imprint on local coastline dynamics between 1986 and 2020, with an average 32 m/yr accretion during mudbank presence and 4 m/yr retreat of the coastline during mudbank absence. Yet, coastal erosion can still occur when mudbanks are present and coastal aggregation may happen in the absence of mudbanks, exemplifying local variability and thus suggesting the importance of other drivers of coastline changes.

The novel remote sensing workflow allowed us to analyse local spatial and temporal variations in the magnitude and timing of expanding and retreating trajectories. Our results demonstrate that it is essential that all coastal behaviours, including changes that cannot be explained by the migration of mudbanks, are included in multi-decadal management frameworks that try to explain current variability, and predict future coastline changes in Suriname.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2500-2517
Number of pages18
JournalEarth Surface Processes and Landforms
Volume47
Issue number10
Early online date26 Apr 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This project was financially supported by the NWO WOTRO Joint Sustainability Development Goal Research Program (Grant No. W07.303.106). We would like to thank Teun van Woerkom for implementing the bilateral filter function in Google Earth Engine. We would also like to thank Antoine Gardel, Edward Anthony and Tanguy Maury from CNRS, Michael Hiwatt from WWF-Guianas, Ginny Bijnaar from Anton de Kom University and CM engineering in Paramaribo for assisting with UAV image acquisition during two field campaigns. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

Funding Information:
This project was financially supported by the NWO WOTRO Joint Sustainability Development Goal Research Program (Grant No. W07.303.106). We would like to thank Teun van Woerkom for implementing the bilateral filter function in Google Earth Engine. We would also like to thank Antoine Gardel, Edward Anthony and Tanguy Maury from CNRS, Michael Hiwatt from WWF‐Guianas, Ginny Bijnaar from Anton de Kom University and CM engineering in Paramaribo for assisting with UAV image acquisition during two field campaigns. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • Google Earth Engine
  • Suriname
  • coastline dynamics
  • mangrove
  • migrating subtidal mudbanks
  • remote sensing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multi‐decadal coastline dynamics in Suriname controlled by migrating subtidal mudbanks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this