Abstract
The 1.5°C target will require removing at least some of the carbon dioxide (CO2) previously emitted. Knowledge on how this can be done has been increasing, though barriers remain concerning governance, policy, and acceptability. For the 26th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP26) to move beyond an academic debate on CO2 removal (CDR), a broader alliance of research and policy communities, industry, and the public is needed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 145-149 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | One Earth |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 21 Aug 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This commentary has benefited from discussions at the First International Conference on Negative Emissions at Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden, in May 2018 and during S.F.'s Jubilee Professorship stay at Chalmers University in 2019. S.F. acknowledges funding by the RESTORE+ project (http://www.restoreplus.org/), part of the International Climate Initiative, supported by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety (BMU) on the basis of a decision adopted by the German Bundestag. G.P.P. was supported by the European Commission Horizon 2020 project Paris Reinforce (grant no. 820846). C.D.J. was supported by the joint UK BEIS/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101).
Funding Information:
This commentary has benefited from discussions at the First International Conference on Negative Emissions at Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden, in May 2018 and during S.F.'s Jubilee Professorship stay at Chalmers University in 2019. S.F. acknowledges funding by the RESTORE+ project ( http://www.restoreplus.org/ ), part of the International Climate Initiative, supported by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety (BMU) on the basis of a decision adopted by the German Bundestag . G.P.P. was supported by the European Commission Horizon 2020 project Paris Reinforce (grant no. 820846 ). C.D.J. was supported by the joint UK BEIS/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme ( GA01101 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
Funding
This commentary has benefited from discussions at the First International Conference on Negative Emissions at Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden, in May 2018 and during S.F.'s Jubilee Professorship stay at Chalmers University in 2019. S.F. acknowledges funding by the RESTORE+ project (http://www.restoreplus.org/), part of the International Climate Initiative, supported by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety (BMU) on the basis of a decision adopted by the German Bundestag. G.P.P. was supported by the European Commission Horizon 2020 project Paris Reinforce (grant no. 820846). C.D.J. was supported by the joint UK BEIS/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). This commentary has benefited from discussions at the First International Conference on Negative Emissions at Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden, in May 2018 and during S.F.'s Jubilee Professorship stay at Chalmers University in 2019. S.F. acknowledges funding by the RESTORE+ project ( http://www.restoreplus.org/ ), part of the International Climate Initiative, supported by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety (BMU) on the basis of a decision adopted by the German Bundestag . G.P.P. was supported by the European Commission Horizon 2020 project Paris Reinforce (grant no. 820846 ). C.D.J. was supported by the joint UK BEIS/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme ( GA01101 ).