Moving Away from Open Judicial Balancing Review: The European Court of Human Rights’ Approach as Illustrated by Its Case Law Relevant to the Covid-19 Pandemic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic truly has been called a global crisis. To fight the spread of the virus, many States have introduced measures that seriously restrict or affect fundamental rights, ranging from procedural rights to the freedom of movement and the right to personal autonomy. In Europe, it is to be expected that many cases concerning such rights infringements eventually will come before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). This contribution aims to give an insight into how the Court will likely give shape to its proportionality test in such cases. It thereby predicts that open balancing review – for which the ECtHR is famous – will play a much less important role than methods of reasoning by analogy and procedural review.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)365-383
Number of pages19
JournalThe Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2023

Keywords

  • Argumentation
  • Balancing
  • Covid-19
  • ECtHR
  • Ec hr
  • Fundamental rights
  • Judicial
  • Proportionality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Moving Away from Open Judicial Balancing Review: The European Court of Human Rights’ Approach as Illustrated by Its Case Law Relevant to the Covid-19 Pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this