More Onerous Work Deserves Higher Pay

H.M. Brouwer, Willem van der Deijl

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

When asked whether some people deserve more income than others, Milton Friedman responded: “I don’t think desert has anything to do with it. Desert is an impossible thing to decide. Who deserves what? Nobody deserves anything. Thank god we don’t get what we deserve!” To defend his skepticism about desert, Friedman points out that how hard people work, and how large of a productive contribution they make, is ultimately a matter of luck. We argue that Friedman’s luck challenge to desert can be resisted. In particular, it seems to us that one particular conception of desert can plausibly justify unequal pay: compensatory desert. Salaries should compensate workers for the relative reduction of welfare opportunities compared to other types of work that exist in society.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEqual Pay for All
Subtitle of host publicationEconomy, Practicability, and Ethics
EditorsAnders Örtenblad
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter4
Pages55-69
Number of pages15
ISBN (Print)9783030535759
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • desert
  • onerousness
  • rawls
  • responsibility
  • well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'More Onerous Work Deserves Higher Pay'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this