Monolingual and bilingual infants’ ability to use non-native tone for word learning deteriorates by the second year after birth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Previous studies reported a non-native word learning advantage for bilingual infants at around 18 months. We investigated developmental changes in infant interpretation of sounds that aid in object mapping. Dutch monolingual and bilingual (exposed to Dutch and a second non-tone-language) infants’ word learning ability was examined on two novel label-object pairings using syllables differing in Mandarin tones as labels (flat vs. falling). Infants aged 14-15 months, regardless of language backgrounds, were sensitive to violations in the label-objects pairings when lexical tones were switched compared to when they were the same as habituated. Conversely at 17-18 months, neither monolingual nor bilingual infants demonstrated learning. Linking with existing literature, infants’ ability to associate non-native tones with meanings may be related to tonal acoustic properties and/or perceptual assimilation to native prosodic categories. These findings provide new insights into the relation between infant tone perception, learning and interpretative narrowing from a developmental perspective.
Original languageEnglish
Article number117
Number of pages12
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2018

Keywords

  • label–object mapping
  • lexical tone
  • bilingualism
  • interpretive narrowing
  • perceptual assimilation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Monolingual and bilingual infants’ ability to use non-native tone for word learning deteriorates by the second year after birth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this