Models of Solidarity in the EMU. The Impact of COVID-19 After Weiss

Ton van den Brink, Matteo Gargantini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Right in the middle of the Covid-19 pandemic, the German federal constitutional court (Bundesverfassungsgericht – FCC) issued a ruling that sent massive shockwaves through the continent. Not only did the Court question the legality of the European Central Bank’s bond buying program PSPP (Public Sector Purchase Program), but it also rejected the earlier decision by the CJEU in which this latter had found that program to respect EU law. The ruling is as such not directly concerned with Covid-19 measures, but it may have nonetheless important consequences thereon. In this contribution we will explore what those consequences may be. Apart from the direct effects on the ECB’s pandemic emergency purchase programme (PEPP), we zoom in on the ruling’s indirect consequences on the broader question of how to arrange solidarity in EMU. With regard to the latter, we contend that Weiss and the Covid-19 crises combined will test the basic models of solidarity the EMU relies upon: the models of individual fiscal responsibility, ECB based solidarity and the model of fiscal union. These models are assessed from economic, constitutional and democratic perspectives.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-102
Number of pages23
JournalUtrecht Law Review
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • EMU
  • EU economic governance
  • COVID-19
  • European Central Bank
  • fiscal union
  • fiscalsolidarity
  • corona recovery fund

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Models of Solidarity in the EMU. The Impact of COVID-19 After Weiss'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this