Modelling Geological CO2 Leakage: Integrating Fracture Permeability and Fault Zone Outcrop Analysis

Roberto E. Rizzo*, Nathaniel D. Forbes Inskip, Hossein Fazeli, Peter Betlem, Kevin Bisdom, Niko Kampman, Jeroen Snippe, Florian Doster, Andreas Busch

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Geological carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a critical technology for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, but the risk of leakage remains a significant concern. Fault and fracture networks across sealing intervals are potential pathways for CO2 to escape from storage reservoirs, necessitating accurate assessment of their permeability and connectivity. Our study presents an integrated approach for modelling geological leakage in fault zones, combining single fracture stress-permeability laboratory measurements with detailed fracture outcrop data to simulate in-situ conditions for carbon storage. We studied caprock sequences cut by a normal fault in the Konusdalen West area (Svalbard, Norway), a regional seal for the reservoir of the Longyearbyen CO2 Laboratory, and an analogue to Barents and North seas caprock formations. Digitising the outcropping fracture network, we explored the variations in fracture size distribution and their connectivity in different portions of the fault zone. These parameters are fundamental to establish if the fracture network provides permeable pathways. Integrating outcrop analysis with laboratory measurements allows us to create coupled hydromechanical models of the natural fracture network and to evaluate their upscaled permeability. We found that fracture network geometries vary across the fault zone, resulting in different upscaled permeability models, thus highlighting the importance of including detailed fracture network information into permeability simulations. Our study provides a framework for incorporating fracture permeability measurements and outcrop analysis into the modelling of geological leakage in fault zones, which can inform the design and operation of CCS projects and help mitigate the risks associated with geological storage of CO2.
Original languageEnglish
Article number104105
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Volume133
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)

Funding

This project has been subsidised through the ERANET Cofund ACT, Netherlands (Project no. 271497 ), the European Commission , the Research Council of Norway (RCN) , the Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland , the Bundesministerium för Wirtschaft und Energie, Germany , and the Department of Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, UK . Additional support was provided by the Norwegian CCS Research Centre (NCCS; industry partners and RCN grant number 257579 ). We further appreciated the data provided by the University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS) CO 2 Laboratory ( http://CO2-ccs.unis.no/ ). This work has further received funding by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme within the SECURe project, under grant agreement number 764531 . We sincerely thank Dr. Chris Wibberley and one anonymous reviewer for their thorough and constructive comments which have greatly improved the original manuscript. We are also grateful to Dr. Diana Bacon for the editorial handling of this paper. This project has been subsidised through the ERANET Cofund ACT, Netherlands (Project no. 271497), the European Commission, the Research Council of Norway (RCN), the Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland, the Bundesministerium för Wirtschaft und Energie, Germany, and the Department of Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, UK. Additional support was provided by the Norwegian CCS Research Centre (NCCS; industry partners and RCN grant number 257579). We further appreciated the data provided by the University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS) CO2 Laboratory (http://CO2-ccs.unis.no/). This work has further received funding by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme within the SECURe project, under grant agreement number 764531. We sincerely thank Dr. Chris Wibberley and one anonymous reviewer for their thorough and constructive comments which have greatly improved the original manuscript. We are also grateful to Dr. Diana Bacon for the editorial handling of this paper.

FundersFunder number
Norwegian CCS Research Centre257579
University Centre in Svalbard
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland
European Commission
Norges Forskningsråd
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Horizon 2020764531

    Keywords

    • Fault damage zone analysis
    • Fracture permeability
    • Geological carbon capture and storage
    • Outcrop studies
    • Permeability modelling

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Modelling Geological CO2 Leakage: Integrating Fracture Permeability and Fault Zone Outcrop Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this