TY - JOUR
T1 - Modelling fore- and hindlimb peak vertical force differences in trotting horses using upper body kinematic asymmetry variables
AU - Roepstorff, Christoffer
AU - Imogen Gmel, Annik
AU - Arpagaus, Samuel
AU - Serra Braganca, Filipe
AU - Hernlund, E.
AU - Roepstorff, Lars
AU - Rhodin, Marie
AU - Weishaupt, M. A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The Ph.D. of C.R was partially financed by Qualisys AB, Sweden. The authors declare that they have no other known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Funding Information:
A.I.G was financed by the Swiss Federal Office for Agriculture, # 625000469. The project P1 was financed by Swedish-Norwegian Foundation for Equine Research (H1247074). M.R was financed by Marie-Claire Cronstedts Stiftelse, Sweden . Matthias Haab for the drawings.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Differences in peak vertical ground reaction forces (dFzpeak) between contralateral forelimbs and hindlimbs are considered the gold standard for quantifying weight-bearing lameness. However, measuring kinematics for the same purpose is more common and practical. Vertical movement asymmetries (VMA) of the horse's upper body have previously been correlated to fore- and hindlimb lameness. But the combined response of head, withers and pelvis VMA to fore- and hindlimb dFzpeak has not yet been thoroughly investigated. Deriving the kinetic responses from kinematics would help the interpretation and understanding of quantified weight-bearing lameness. In this retrospective study, 103 horses with a wide range of fore- and hindlimb dFzpeak had been trotted on a force-measuring treadmill synchronized with an optical motion capture system. VMA of the head, withers and pelvis as well as dFzpeak were extracted. Multiple linear mixed models and linear regressions of kinematic variables were used to model the dFzpeak. It was hypothesised that all included VMA would have a significant influence on the dFzpeak outcome variables. The results showed a complex relationship between VMA and dFzpeak where both amplitude and timing of the VMA were of importance. On average, the contribution percentage of VMA to fore/hind dFzpeak were 66/34% for head, 76/24% for withers and 33/67% for pelvis. The linear regressions for the fore/hindlimb models achieved mean measurement root mean squared errors of 0.83%/0.82% dFzpeak. These results might help determine the clinical relevance of upper body VMA and distinguish between primary fore, hind, ipsilateral and diagonal weight-bearing lameness.
AB - Differences in peak vertical ground reaction forces (dFzpeak) between contralateral forelimbs and hindlimbs are considered the gold standard for quantifying weight-bearing lameness. However, measuring kinematics for the same purpose is more common and practical. Vertical movement asymmetries (VMA) of the horse's upper body have previously been correlated to fore- and hindlimb lameness. But the combined response of head, withers and pelvis VMA to fore- and hindlimb dFzpeak has not yet been thoroughly investigated. Deriving the kinetic responses from kinematics would help the interpretation and understanding of quantified weight-bearing lameness. In this retrospective study, 103 horses with a wide range of fore- and hindlimb dFzpeak had been trotted on a force-measuring treadmill synchronized with an optical motion capture system. VMA of the head, withers and pelvis as well as dFzpeak were extracted. Multiple linear mixed models and linear regressions of kinematic variables were used to model the dFzpeak. It was hypothesised that all included VMA would have a significant influence on the dFzpeak outcome variables. The results showed a complex relationship between VMA and dFzpeak where both amplitude and timing of the VMA were of importance. On average, the contribution percentage of VMA to fore/hind dFzpeak were 66/34% for head, 76/24% for withers and 33/67% for pelvis. The linear regressions for the fore/hindlimb models achieved mean measurement root mean squared errors of 0.83%/0.82% dFzpeak. These results might help determine the clinical relevance of upper body VMA and distinguish between primary fore, hind, ipsilateral and diagonal weight-bearing lameness.
KW - Equine kinematics
KW - Kinetics
KW - Lameness
KW - Motion capture
KW - Time–frequency analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129274649&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111097
DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111097
M3 - Article
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 137
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
M1 - 111097
ER -