Abstract
The current article aims to provide an up-to-date synopsis of available techniques to study affect dynamics using intensive longitudinal data (ILD). We do so by introducing the following eight dichotomies that help elucidate what kind of data one has,
what process aspects are of interest, and what research questions are being considered: (a) single- versus multiple-person data; (b) univariate versus multivariate models; (c) stationary versus nonstationary models; (d) linear versus nonlinear models; (e) discrete
time versus continuous time models; (f) discrete versus continuous variables; (g) time versus frequency domain; and (h) modeling the process versus computing descriptives. In addition, we discuss what we believe to be the most urging future challenges
regarding the modeling of affect dynamics.
what process aspects are of interest, and what research questions are being considered: (a) single- versus multiple-person data; (b) univariate versus multivariate models; (c) stationary versus nonstationary models; (d) linear versus nonlinear models; (e) discrete
time versus continuous time models; (f) discrete versus continuous variables; (g) time versus frequency domain; and (h) modeling the process versus computing descriptives. In addition, we discuss what we believe to be the most urging future challenges
regarding the modeling of affect dynamics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-7 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Emotion Review |
Volume | 7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- affective dynamics
- intensive longitudinal data
- within-person