Abstract
One of the dominant global development agendas for rural Africa in the past two decades has cast large-scale agro-industrial investments as a solution to achieve more efficient land use, higher crop yields, enhanced food security, and poverty reduction, among others. However, mounting evidence shows that this agenda has not fulfilled its promises: most land deals for agricultural production have not materialised as planned and their socio-economic development objectives often remain unreached. Despite the often severe impacts of non-operational projects, knowledge about why they fail to take place and operate remains fragmentary. Based on an extensive literature review of contemporary land deals in seven sub-Saharan countries, this paper sheds light on two ‘productive gaps’. First, the article delves into the ‘productive gap’ of land deals themselves, identifying key drivers of non-operational land deals. The reviewed literature points to local opposition and financial difficulties as significant factors impacting agricultural operations. Local opposition, in turn, stems largely from flawed land acquisition processes and unfulfilled investors’ promises. Second, this article offers a critical appraisal of the biases and oversights in the knowledge the land grab scholarship has ‘produced’.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1167-1183 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Development Studies |
Volume | 60 |
Issue number | 8 |
Early online date | 4 Apr 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Funding
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Canadian Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council |
Keywords
- comparative analysis
- failed land deals
- Land rush
- large-scale agro-industrial investment
- local opposition
- sub-Saharan Africa