Mimetics in judicial argumentation: A theoretical exploration

P.J. van den Hoven

Mimetics in judicial argumentation: A theoretical exploration

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

To resolve a conflict of opinion regarding the past it is inevitable to present a reconstruction of that past, explicitly or implicitly. This we call the mimetic element. On an abstract level, a complete argumentation in the genus iudiciale requires a start that is mimetic and a follow-up that is diegetic. The question to be discussed is whether mimetic elements need to be formatted as sets of propositions and if so by whom.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA). 22-26 May 2013
Editors	D. Mohammed, M. Lewiński
Place of Publication	Windsor, Ontario
Publisher	OSSA
Pages	1-8
Number of pages	8
Publication status	Published - 2014

Cite this

@inproceedings{803367463de4498cb5b876a018d583c7,

title = "Mimetics in judicial argumentation: A theoretical exploration",

abstract = "To resolve a conflict of opinion regarding the past it is inevitable to present a reconstruction of that past, explicitly or implicitly. This we call the mimetic element. On an abstract level, a complete argumentation in the genus iudiciale requires a start that is mimetic and a follow-up that is diegetic. The question to be discussed is whether mimetic elements need to be formatted as sets of propositions and if so by whom.",

author = "\{van den Hoven\}, P.J.",

year = "2014",

language = "English",

pages = "1--8",

editor = "D. Mohammed and M. Lewi{\'n}ski",

booktitle = "Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA). 22-26 May 2013",

publisher = "OSSA",

}

Mimetics in judicial argumentation: A theoretical exploration. / van den Hoven, P.J.
Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA). 22-26 May 2013. ed. / D. Mohammed; M. Lewiński. Windsor, Ontario: OSSA, 2014. p. 1-8.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Mimetics in judicial argumentation: A theoretical exploration

AU - van den Hoven, P.J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - To resolve a conflict of opinion regarding the past it is inevitable to present a reconstruction of that past, explicitly or implicitly. This we call the mimetic element. On an abstract level, a complete argumentation in the genus iudiciale requires a start that is mimetic and a follow-up that is diegetic. The question to be discussed is whether mimetic elements need to be formatted as sets of propositions and if so by whom.

AB - To resolve a conflict of opinion regarding the past it is inevitable to present a reconstruction of that past, explicitly or implicitly. This we call the mimetic element. On an abstract level, a complete argumentation in the genus iudiciale requires a start that is mimetic and a follow-up that is diegetic. The question to be discussed is whether mimetic elements need to be formatted as sets of propositions and if so by whom.

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 1

EP - 8

BT - Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA). 22-26 May 2013

A2 - Mohammed, D.

A2 - Lewiński, M.

PB - OSSA

CY - Windsor, Ontario

ER -

Mimetics in judicial argumentation: A theoretical exploration

Abstract

Fingerprint

Cite this