Mid-Pliocene not analogous to high-CO2 climate when considering Northern Hemisphere winter variability

Arthur Merlijn Oldeman*, Michiel L. J. Baatsen, Anna S. von der Heydt, Aarnout J. van Delden, Henk A. Dijkstra

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this study, we address the question of whether the mid-Pliocene climate can act as an analogue for a future warm climate with elevated CO2 concentrations, specifically regarding Northern Hemisphere winter variability. We use a set of sensitivity simulations with the global coupled climate model CESM1.0.5 (CCSM4-Utr), which is part of the PlioMIP2 model ensemble, to separate the response to a CO2 doubling and to mid-Pliocene boundary conditions other than CO2. In the CO2 doubling simulation, the Aleutian low deepens, and the Pacific-North American pattern (PNA) strengthens. In response to the mid-Pliocene boundary conditions, sea-level pressure variance decreases over the North Pacific, the PNA becomes weaker and the North Pacific Oscillation (NPO) becomes the dominant mode of variability. The mid-Pliocene simulation shows a weak North Pacific jet stream that is less variable in intensity but has a high level of variation in jet latitude, consistent with a dominant NPO and indicating that North Pacific atmospheric dynamics become more North Atlantic-like. We demonstrate that the weakening of the Aleutian low, and subsequent relative dominance of the NPO over the PNA, is related to shifts in tropical Pacific convection. Variability in the North Atlantic shows little variation between all simulations. The opposite response in North Pacific winter variability to elevated CO2 or mid-Pliocene boundary conditions demonstrates that the mid-Pliocene climate cannot serve as a future analogue in this regard.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)395-417
Number of pages23
JournalWeather and Climate Dynamics
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Arthur Merlijn Oldeman et al.

Funding

Output from CCSM4-Utr simulations is available upon request. Please contact Michiel Baatsen ([email protected]) for access. NOAA/CIRES/DOE 20th Century Reanalysis (V3) data are provided by the NOAA PSL, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their website at https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.20thC_ReanV3.html (last access: 28 February 2023, Slivinski et al., 2021). An evaluation of the performance of the CR20v3 can be found in . Support for the Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project version 3 dataset is provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research (BER); by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate Program Office; and by the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences Laboratory. This research has been supported by the Netherlands Earth System Science Centre (grant no. OCW 024.002.001). Simulations were performed at the SURFsara Dutch national computing facilities and were sponsored by NWO-EW (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Exact Sciences) (project nos. 17189 and 2020.022). The authors would like to thank Michael Kliphuis for setting up and managing the CCSM4-Utr model simulations and Ezekiel Djeribi Stevens for their performed analysis and interpretation on the CCSM4-Utr NAO. The authors express their gratitude to two anonymous reviewers and the co-editor for providing useful feedback on an earlier version of the manuscript.

FundersFunder number
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences Laboratory
Biological and Environmental Research
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
U.S. Department of Energy
Netherlands Earth System Science CentreOCW 024.002.001
NWO-EW17189, 2020.022

    Keywords

    • Atmospheric circulation
    • Atlantic oscillation
    • Arctic oscillation
    • Sea-ice
    • Teleconnections
    • Pacific
    • Uncertainty
    • Mechanisms

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mid-Pliocene not analogous to high-CO2 climate when considering Northern Hemisphere winter variability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this