Microstructural analysis of Greenland ice using a cryogenic scanning electron microscope equipped with an electron backscatter diffraction detector

Wataru Shigeyama*, Naoko Nagatsuka, Tomoyuki Homma, Morimasa Takata, Kumiko Goto-Azuma, Ilka Weikusat, Martyn R. Drury, Ernst Jan N. Kuiper, Ramona V. Mateiu, Nobuhiko Azuma, Dorthe Dahl-Jensen, Sepp Kipfstuhl

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Mass loss from ice sheets contributes to global sea level rise, and accelerated ice flow to the oceans is one of the major causes of rapid ice sheet mass loss. To understand flow dynamics of polar ice sheets, we need to understand deformation mechanisms of the polycrystalline ice in ice sheets. Laboratory experiments have shown that deformation of polycrystalline ice occurs largely by dislocation glide, which mainly depends on crystal orientation distribution. Grain size and impurities are also important factors that determine ice deformation mechanisms. Compared with ice formed during interglacial periods, ice formed during glacial periods, especially ice that forms cloudy bands, exhibits finer grain sizes and higher impurity concentrations. A previous report suggests the deformation rate of ice containing cloudy bands is higher than that of ice without cloudy bands. To examine the microstructures and deformation histories of ice in cloudy bands, we applied the electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) technique to samples from the Greenland Ice Sheet using an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) equipped with cold stages. Prior to the EBSD analysis, we optimised our ESEM/EBSD system and performed angular error assessment using artificial ice. In terms of c-and a-axis orientation distributions and grain orientation spread, we found little difference between samples taken from a cloudy band and those taken from an adjacent layer of clear ice. However, subgrain boundary density and orientation gradients were higher in the cloudy band, suggesting that there are more dislocations in the cloudy band than in the clear ice layer.

Original languageEnglish
Article number9R01
Pages (from-to)31-45
Number of pages15
JournalBulletin of Glaciological Research
Volume37
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Funding

  We thank Dr. Gill M. Pennock for technical support with the development of our ESEM/EBSD system and method, and Prof. Shuji Fujita for his support in using the fabric analyser. We also thank all the NEEM project members involved in logistics, drilling and ice-core processing. NEEM is directed and organised by the Centre of Ice and Climate at the Niels Bohr Institute and US NSF, Office of Polar Programs. NEEM is supported by funding agencies and institutions in Belgium (FNRS-CFB and FWO), Canada (NRCan/GSC), China (CAS), Denmark (FIST), France (IPEV, CNRS/INSU, CEA and ANR), Germany (AWI), Iceland (RannIs), Japan (NIPR), Korea (KOPRI), The Netherlands (NWO/ALW), Sweden (VR), Switzerland (SNF), United Kingdom (NERC) and the USA (US NSF, Office of Polar Programs). We thank the anonymous reviewer for the helpful comments.   This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [grant JP22221002, 15K13567 and 17H02957], Arctic Challenge for Sustainability (ArCS) project, Japan Student Services Organization, a Short Visit Grant by the European Science Foundation [reference no. 7130] and the Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI.

Keywords

  • Cloudy band
  • Cryogenic ESEM/EBSD
  • Greenland ice sheet
  • Microstructure
  • NEEM ice core

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Microstructural analysis of Greenland ice using a cryogenic scanning electron microscope equipped with an electron backscatter diffraction detector'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this