Abstract
The mechanical behavior of porous sandstones is generally modeled using concepts from granular mechanics, often overlooking the effect of cementation. To probe the key differences between sand and sandstone mechanics, we performed triaxial deformation experiments on Ottawa quartz sand at 5- to 40 MPa effective confining pressure. At 5 MPa, the samples are able to dilate. At higher confinement, the aggregates show continuous compaction, displaying strain hardening. The stress-strain behavior is nonlinear, and the exact onset of inelastic compaction could not be determined accurately. Measured P-wave velocities show the development of anisotropy. With increasing axial strain, the along-axis velocities tend to increase, while velocities perpendicular to the compression axis tend to decrease (at low pressure) or remain constant (at high pressure). In samples deformed under elevated pressure conditions, acoustic emission event locations are diffuse. Microstructural investigations show an increase in grain chipping and crushing with increasing confining pressure, but no evidence of localized compaction could be observed. The nature of the pore fluid, either decane or water, does not significantly influence the mechanical behavior at strain rates of 10−6 to 10−4 s−1. Grain angularity and grain-size distribution also did not significantly change the mechanical behavior. We infer that our observations indicate that the lack of cementation introduces additional degrees of freedom for grains to slide, rotate, and reorganize at the sample scale, precluding the existence and sustainability of stress concentrations beyond the grain scale. This results in progressive compaction and hardening, and lack of compaction localization.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 6560-6580 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth |
Volume | 124 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2019 |
Funding
The authors thank Associate Editor Michele Cooke, Brian Evans, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on our manuscript. S.?J.?T.?H. performed this work as part of the Utrecht University Sustainability Research Theme. N.?B. acknowledges support from the UK Natural Environment Research Council, Grant NE/K009656/1. Chris Spiers, Patrick Baud, J?r?me Fortin, and Antonino Cilona are thanked for their helpful discussions. Experimental data are available from the UK National Geoscience Data Centre (http://www.bgs.ac.uk/services/ngdc/) or upon request to the corresponding author.
Keywords
- acoustic properties
- mechanical properties
- microstructure
- sand compaction