Abstract
This chapter is based on experiences from several research projects on human smuggling and reflects on methodological and ethical concerns when considering fieldwork with smuggled migrants. It is argued that, already from the start, ethical issues may be beyond the control of researchers, as professional review boards themselves are in a powerful position to set the terms for selecting who should be included in research projects and who not. While today it is acknowledged that taking the migrant’s perspective into account is valuable, there are still some challenges to be dealt with. This chapter touches upon the issues of gaining access to participants and building up trust in a context of mistrust and how narrations might be influenced by external structural factors such as the migration experience, policies and administrations, smugglers or the migrant community itself.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Qualitative Research in European Migration Studies |
Editors | Ricard Zapata-Barrero, Evren Yalaz |
Place of Publication | Cham |
Publisher | Springer |
Pages | 269-285 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Edition | 1 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-3-319-76861-8 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-3-319-76860-1, 978-3-030-08311-3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 29 Jun 2018 |
Publication series
Name | IMISCOE Research Series |
---|---|
ISSN (Print) | 2364-4087 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 2364-4095 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2018.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Asylum Determination Process
- Asylum Hearing
- External Structural Factors
- Human Smuggling
- Vulnerable Migrants