Meta-externalism vs meta-internalism in the study of reference

Daniel Cohnitz, Jussi Haukioja

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    We distinguish and discuss two different accounts of the subject matter of theories of reference, meta-externalism and meta-internalism. We argue that a form of the meta-internalist view, "moderate meta-internalism", is the most plausible account of the subject matter of theories of reference. In the second part of the paper we explain how this account also helps to answer the questions of what kind of concept reference is, and what role intuitions have in the study of the reference relation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)475-500
    Number of pages26
    JournalAustralasian Journal of Philosophy
    Volume91
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2013

    Keywords

    • externalism
    • internalism
    • intuition
    • meta-externalism
    • meta-internalism
    • philosophical methodology
    • reference

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Meta-externalism vs meta-internalism in the study of reference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this