Meta-analyses: key parenting program components for disruptive child behavior

Patty Leijten*, Frances Gardner, G.j. Melendez-torres, Jolien Van Aar, Judy Hutchings, Susanne Schulz, Wendy Knerr, Geertjan Overbeek

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective
Parenting programs are the recommended strategy for the prevention and treatment of disruptive child behavior. Similar to most psychosocial interventions, it is unknown which components of parenting programs (ie, parenting techniques taught) actually contribute to program effects. Identifying what parents need to be taught to reduce disruptive child behavior can optimize intervention strategies, and refine theories on how parenting shapes disruptive child behavior.

Method
In two meta-analyses, we updated the evidence-base for effectiveness of parenting programs delivered at various levels of prevention and treatment of disruptive behavior. We searched six databases (eg, PsycINFO, MEDLINE) for randomized trials and coded the parenting techniques taught in each program. We identified the techniques associated with program effects in general, and for prevention versus treatment, and immediate versus longer-term effects, specifically.

Results
Parenting program effects on disruptive behavior gradually increased per level of prevention (universal d = −0.21, selective d = −0.27, indicated d = −0.55) and treatment (d = −0.69) (Meta-Analysis 1: 154 trials, 398 effect sizes). Three of 26 parenting techniques were associated with stronger program effects: positive reinforcement, praise in particular, and natural/logical consequences. Several additional techniques (eg, relationship building and parental self-management) were associated with stronger effects in treatment but weaker effects in prevention. No techniques were associated with stronger longer-term effects (Meta-Analysis 2: 42 trials, 157 effect sizes).

Conclusion
Positive reinforcement and nonviolent discipline techniques (eg, applying natural/logical consequences) seem to be key parenting program techniques to reduce disruptive child behavior. Additional techniques (eg, parental self-management skills) might improve program effects in treatment, but not in prevention.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)180-190
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume58
Issue number2
Early online date1 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Keywords

  • disruptive child behavior
  • parenting programs
  • meta-analysis
  • identifying effective components
  • preventioa

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Meta-analyses: key parenting program components for disruptive child behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this