TY - JOUR
T1 - Meeting goals of sustainability policy
T2 - CO2 emission reduction, cost-effectiveness and societal acceptance. An analysis of the proposal to phase-out coal in the Netherlands
AU - Akerboom, Sanne
AU - Botzen, Wouter
AU - Buijze, Anoeska
AU - Michels, Ank
AU - van Rijswick, Marleen
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - The mitigation of global climate change renders effective policy indispensable. In this paper we evaluate a policy drafted in the Netherlands to close all its remaining coal-fired plants by 2030, which is well before the end of their technical and economic life spans. This plan is part of a package to reduce CO2 emissions with 25% by 2020 and 49% by 2030 in comparison to 1990. Under Dutch policy, all measures taken must meet three goals: CO2 emission reduction, cost-effectiveness and societal support. We will show that existing EU legal frameworks limit the effectiveness of the closure, because they allow for carbon leakage and lack a coordinated European strategy on the coal phase out, even though several EU member states have formulated similar plans. There is also no definitive answer as to whether the coal phase out is cost-effective. Dutch government will have to decide what the parameters of ‘cost-effective’ are. So far, the plan enjoys societal support. It is up to the Dutch government to decide what balance between CO2 emissions, costs and societal support is best. For further action, we recommend an EU strategy on the coal-phase out, in order to coordinate and to prevent carbon leakages.
AB - The mitigation of global climate change renders effective policy indispensable. In this paper we evaluate a policy drafted in the Netherlands to close all its remaining coal-fired plants by 2030, which is well before the end of their technical and economic life spans. This plan is part of a package to reduce CO2 emissions with 25% by 2020 and 49% by 2030 in comparison to 1990. Under Dutch policy, all measures taken must meet three goals: CO2 emission reduction, cost-effectiveness and societal support. We will show that existing EU legal frameworks limit the effectiveness of the closure, because they allow for carbon leakage and lack a coordinated European strategy on the coal phase out, even though several EU member states have formulated similar plans. There is also no definitive answer as to whether the coal phase out is cost-effective. Dutch government will have to decide what the parameters of ‘cost-effective’ are. So far, the plan enjoys societal support. It is up to the Dutch government to decide what balance between CO2 emissions, costs and societal support is best. For further action, we recommend an EU strategy on the coal-phase out, in order to coordinate and to prevent carbon leakages.
KW - Climate change mitigation
KW - CO emissions
KW - Interdisciplinary policy analysis
KW - Regulation
KW - Renewable energy
KW - Sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078208279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111210
DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111210
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85078208279
SN - 0301-4215
VL - 138
JO - Energy Policy
JF - Energy Policy
M1 - 111210
ER -