Media en tolerantie in de Republiek der Letteren: De discussie over Isaac de La Peyrère (ca. 1596-1676) en zijn Prae-Adamitae

Translated title of the contribution: Media and tolerance in the Republic of Letters: The discussion about Isaac de La Peyrère (ca. 1596-1676) and his Prae-Adamitae

Dirk van Miert, Henk Nellen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The learned letter is attracting ever more attention as a source for the pursuit of the history of knowledge, partly because correspondences are rapidly being digitized. The letter straddles the divide between a conversation and a publication. Letters could have a confidential character, but writers could also expect letters to circulate amongst associates. Harold Love’s notion of ‘scribal publication’, with which he describes the circulation of newsletters, appears to be also applicable, to a certain extent, to the communicational situation of the personal ‘familiar’ letter. In this paper, the heretical ideas of the French exegete Isaac de La Peyrère serve as a case to go beyond Love in developing the notion of ‘scribal publication’. We connect it to the ‘culture of discussion’ which was characteristic of the Dutch Republic around 1650 (Willem Frijhoff and Marijke Spies) and to the idea of civil conversation as a tolerant setting for discussion (Steven Shapin).
Translated title of the contributionMedia and tolerance in the Republic of Letters: The discussion about Isaac de La Peyrère (ca. 1596-1676) and his Prae-Adamitae
Original languageDutch
Article numberURN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-116251
Pages (from-to)3-19
Number of pages17
JournalDe zeventiende eeuw
Volume30
Issue number1
Early online date1 Sept 2014
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • La Peyrère, Biblical criticism, men before Adam, correspondence, confidentiality, epistolary codes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Media and tolerance in the Republic of Letters: The discussion about Isaac de La Peyrère (ca. 1596-1676) and his Prae-Adamitae'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this