TY - JOUR
T1 - Math items about real-world content lower test-scores of students from families with low socioeconomic status
AU - Muskens, Marjolein
AU - Frankenhuis, Willem E.
AU - Borghans, Lex
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/3/15
Y1 - 2024/3/15
N2 - In many countries, standardized math tests are important for achieving academic success. Here, we examine whether content of items, the story that explains a mathematical question, biases performance of low-SES students. In a large-scale cohort study of Trends in International Mathematics and Science Studies (TIMSS)—including data from 58 countries from students in grades 4 and 8 (N = 5501,165)—we examine whether item content that is more likely related to challenges for low-SES students (money, food, social relationships) improves their performance, compared with their average math performance. Results show that low-SES students scored lower on items with this specific content than expected based on an individual’s average performance. The effect sizes are substantial: on average, the chance to answer correctly is 18% lower. From a hidden talents approach, these results are unexpected. However, they align with other theoretical frameworks such as scarcity mindset, providing new insights for fair testing.
AB - In many countries, standardized math tests are important for achieving academic success. Here, we examine whether content of items, the story that explains a mathematical question, biases performance of low-SES students. In a large-scale cohort study of Trends in International Mathematics and Science Studies (TIMSS)—including data from 58 countries from students in grades 4 and 8 (N = 5501,165)—we examine whether item content that is more likely related to challenges for low-SES students (money, food, social relationships) improves their performance, compared with their average math performance. Results show that low-SES students scored lower on items with this specific content than expected based on an individual’s average performance. The effect sizes are substantial: on average, the chance to answer correctly is 18% lower. From a hidden talents approach, these results are unexpected. However, they align with other theoretical frameworks such as scarcity mindset, providing new insights for fair testing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187939912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41539-024-00228-8
DO - 10.1038/s41539-024-00228-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 38491021
AN - SCOPUS:85187939912
SN - 2056-7936
VL - 9
JO - npj Science of Learning
JF - npj Science of Learning
IS - 1
M1 - 19
ER -