Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mandometer treatment not superior to treatment as usual for anorexia nervosa

  • Annemarie A van Elburg
  • , Jacquelien J G Hillebrand
  • , Chaim Huyser
  • , Maartje Snoek
  • , Martien J H Kas
  • , Hans W Hoek
  • , Roger A H Adan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A comparison of the efficacy of a novel treatment method for anorexia nervosa (AN), the Mandometer treatment (MT), with treatment as usual (TAU).

METHOD: During treatment data were collected to determine weight recovery and outcome as assessed by the Morgan Russell Outcome Assessment Schedule (MROAS).

RESULTS: After treatment 63% of the MT group and 85% of the TAU group had reached a normal weight level and both MT and TAU showed a good outcome on the MROAS (75 and 71%, respectively). After two years more MT than TAU patients were still in treatment and more MT patients had relapsed.

DISCUSSION: The outcome for both treatments in our study were similar and comparable with, if not better than outcome data of other AN studies. MT is not superior to TAU in outcome results and in relapse rate during the first two years following admission for AN treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)193-201
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Eating Disorders
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Anorexia Nervosa
  • Body Weight
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mandometer treatment not superior to treatment as usual for anorexia nervosa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this