TY - JOUR
T1 - Making Power Explicit
T2 - Why Liberal Egalitarians Should Take (Economic) Power Seriously
AU - Claassen, Rutger
AU - Herzog, Lisa
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - In this paper we argue that liberal-egalitarian theorists of justice should take power, especially economic power, seriously and make it explicit. We argue that many theories of justice have left power implicit, relying on what we call the “primacy of politics” model as a background assumption. However, this model does not suffice to capture the power relations of today’s globalized world, in which the power of nation states has been reduced and material inequality has sky-rocketed. We suggest replacing it by a “political economy” model that emphasizes the possibility of self-reinforcing cycles. Doing so has direct implications for how to theorize justice, not only on the non-ideal, but also on the ideal level.
AB - In this paper we argue that liberal-egalitarian theorists of justice should take power, especially economic power, seriously and make it explicit. We argue that many theories of justice have left power implicit, relying on what we call the “primacy of politics” model as a background assumption. However, this model does not suffice to capture the power relations of today’s globalized world, in which the power of nation states has been reduced and material inequality has sky-rocketed. We suggest replacing it by a “political economy” model that emphasizes the possibility of self-reinforcing cycles. Doing so has direct implications for how to theorize justice, not only on the non-ideal, but also on the ideal level.
U2 - 10.5840/soctheorpract202147119
DO - 10.5840/soctheorpract202147119
M3 - Article
SN - 0037-802X
VL - 47
SP - 221
EP - 246
JO - Social Theory and Practice
JF - Social Theory and Practice
IS - 2
ER -