Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Magnet4Europe Intervention to Improve Clinician and Patient Well-Being: A Quasi-Experimental Study of 56 Hospitals in 6 European Countries

  • Magnet4Europe consortium
  • , Linda H Aiken
  • , Walter Sermeus
  • , Karen B Lasater*
  • , Reinhard Busse
  • , Martin McKee
  • , Herbert Smith
  • , Jonathan Drennan
  • , Claudia B Maier
  • , Jane Ball
  • , Simon Dello
  • , Dorothea Kohnen
  • , Rikard Lindqvist
  • , Anners Lerdal
  • , Peter Griffiths
  • , Wilmar B Schaufeli
  • , Hans De Witte
  • , Lars E Eriksson
  • , Anne Marie Rafferty
  • , Julia Köppen
  • Lisa Smeds Alenius, Matthew D McHugh
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Descriptive studies have documented high hospital nurse burnout and turnover but there are few, if any, large-scale evaluations of organizational interventions to improve clinician retention. The Magnet model is an organizational hospital intervention associated with better clinician and patient outcomes but there is insufficient evidence as to whether the Magnet model based on structural empowerment of clinicians results in better outcomes or rewards hospitals with good work environments, and whether the Magnet model can be implemented at scale outside the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether Magnet4Europe-a multiyear organizational intervention of European hospitals-could be implemented and would result in improvements in nurse well-being, care quality, and patient safety.

DESIGN: Quasi-experimental longitudinal evaluation of 56 European intervention hospitals in 6 countries. Hospital-level implementation of the intervention measured by changes (from baseline to follow-up) in 77 Magnet model intervention targets. Outcome measures (eg, nurse burnout, intent to leave, quality of care, patient safety) were derived from surveys of nurses (4546 nurses at baseline; 3171 at follow-up).

FINDINGS: Hospitals that implemented intervention targets during the study period observed reductions in nurse burnout, nurses' intentions to leave their jobs, and unfavorable care quality. Each 10-percentage-point increase in intervention target implementation was associated with 2.7%-point reduction in nurses who intend to leave (β -2.66; 95% CI: -4.74, -0.58, P <0.05). Hospitals which implemented more than 25% of intervention targets observed 6.3%-point reduction in nurse burnout, 7.6%-point reduction in intent to leave, 6.4%-point reduction in unfavorable care quality, and 3.7%-point reduction in unfavorable patient safety. Improvements in hospital percentages of nurses reporting staffing adequacy were associated with reductions in burnout, intentions to leave, unfavorable care quality, and patient safety.

CONCLUSION: Successful implementation of Magnet4Europe demonstrates promise for international adoption at scale of Magnet as an organizational intervention for improving clinician well-being, care quality, and patient safety.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-58
Number of pages9
JournalMedical Care
Volume64
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2026

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Keywords

  • burnout
  • clinician
  • hospital
  • wellbeing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Magnet4Europe Intervention to Improve Clinician and Patient Well-Being: A Quasi-Experimental Study of 56 Hospitals in 6 European Countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this