Macro-level determinants of young people’s subjective health and health inequalities: a multilevel analysis in 27 welfare states

K. Rathmann, V. Ottova, K. Hurrelmann, M.E. de Looze, K. Levin, M. Molcho, F. Elgar, S. Nic Gabhainn, J. van Dijk, M. Richter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cross-national studies have rarely focused on young people. The aim of this study is to investigate whether macro-level determinants are associated with health and socioeconomic inequalities in young people's health.
STUDY DESIGN: Data were collected from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study in 2006, which included 11- to 15-year old adolescents from 27 European and North American countries (n=134,632). This study includes national income, health expenditure, income inequality, and welfare regime dummy-variables as macro-level determinants, using hierarchical regression modelling.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Psychosomatic health complaints and socioeconomic inequalities in psychosomatic health complaints.
RESULTS: Adolescents in countries with higher income inequality and with liberal welfare tradition were associated with more health complaints and a stronger relationship between socioeconomic status and macro-level determinants compared to adolescents from countries with lower income inequality or the Social Democratic regime. National income and health expenditure were not related to health complaints. Countries with higher national income, public health expenditure and income inequality showed stronger associations between socioeconomic status and psychosomatic health complaints.
CONCLUSION: Results showed that macro-level characteristics are relevant determinants of health and health inequalities in adolescence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)414-420
JournalMaturitas
Volume80
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Macro-level determinants of young people’s subjective health and health inequalities: a multilevel analysis in 27 welfare states'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this