Lung cancer mortality in a Dutch cohort of asphalt workers: Evaluation of possible confounding by smoking

M. Hooiveld, T. Spee, I. Burstyn, H. Kromhout, D.J.J. Heederik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background
Using data from a Dutch cohort of workers in road construction and asphalt mixing companies, this article describes possible confounding of the association between exposure to bitumen fume and lung cancer mortality by smoking.

Methods
A retrospective cohort of 3,714 workers with at least one season of employment was identified. Semi‐quantitative exposure to bitumen fume was assessed by a job‐exposure matrix. Information on smoking habits was available for a sub‐cohort of 1,138 workers, who underwent medical examinations by the occupational health services in the past.

Results
Smoking habits differed between occupational title groups and there was a positive association between cumulative exposure and smoking. Internal analyses using the non‐exposed subjects as reference category, showed a positive association between semi‐quantitative bitumen fume exposure and lung cancer risk. After adjusting for differences in smoking habits, all relative risks were reduced, but a weak positive association could still be observed.

Conclusion
Confounding by smoking on the association between exposure to bitumen fume and lung cancer mortality is possible, although the positive trend (not statistically significant) for lung cancer mortality remained. Only a nested case‐control study may allow proper treatment of potential (residual) confounding by smoking in this population. Am. J. Ind. Med. 43:79–87, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-87
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2003

Keywords

  • occupational exposure
  • asphalt
  • bitumen
  • mortality
  • lung cancer
  • smoking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lung cancer mortality in a Dutch cohort of asphalt workers: Evaluation of possible confounding by smoking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this