Low Latency Feedback: Contrasting Training Outcomes of Immediate versus Delayed Feedback in Speedrunning Super Mario Bros.

Ioannis Bikas, Johannes Pfau, Thomas Muender, Rainer Malaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

With the rise of popularity and societal importance of video games, trends of grinding play for excessive amounts of time to improve proficiency becomes more and more common. This bears not only physical and mental health risks, but has already shown to be detrimental for skill acquisition, defeating its purpose in the first place. For the sake of health promotion, well-being, and the advancement of self-regulated learning, we specifically investigate the impact of detailed feedback on player performance. As research about comparable activities in related domains suggest inconclusive implications for when feedback in video game learning should be presented, we particularly explore the impact of delivering immediate versus delayed feedback, during or after play. Using (n = 30) participants and the well-investigated Super Mario Bros., we communicate insights in favor for deploying feedback immediately when polishing one’s video game related skills such as in speedrunning.

Original languageEnglish
Article number322
Number of pages14
JournalProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Volume8
Issue numberCHI PLAY
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2024

Keywords

  • Competitive video games
  • feedback
  • observational study
  • player performance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low Latency Feedback: Contrasting Training Outcomes of Immediate versus Delayed Feedback in Speedrunning Super Mario Bros.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this