Abstract
Scope 3 emissions of non-state actors are increasingly relevant. These emissions are becoming more significant in the legal debate regarding climate change mitigation and liability. There are various reasons for this trend, such as increasing attention for these emissions in litigation, IPCC reports and (legal) literature. This contribution focusses on the legal questions that arise in cases concerning scope 3 emissions. However, the focus in this contribution is primarily on the Milieudefensie/Shell case in which a significant best-efforts obligation has been imposed to reduce scope 3 emissions. A reduction order that seems to be unique worldwide.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 116-134 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Journal for European Envrionmental & Planning Law |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 24 Jul 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© EDWARD BRANS AND MATHIJS PETERS, 2024.
Keywords
- climate change liability
- negative emissions
- scope 3 emissions
- voluntary carbon credits