Abstract
This dissertation explores the human ability for non-adjacent dependency-learning, which allows adults and infants to detect the relationship between a and b in an aXb string. I use artificial grammar learning with adults and infants to investigate whether non-adjacent dependency-learning could facilitate the detection of morpho-syntactic dependencies in natural languages (The princess is gently kissing the frog).
Morpho-syntactic dependencies are typically instantiated between functional morphemes (is, -ing), straddling lexical morphemes (gently, kiss). Functional morphemes are often less prosodically prominent than lexical ones. I investigate the role that this prosodic contrast could play in non-adjacent dependency-learning: both adults and infants learn aXb dependencies when a/b are prosodically prominent, but also when they are prosodically weak compared to the intervening X, similar to functional morphemes straddling a lexical word. The prosodic properties of natural languages could thus facilitate non-adjacent dependency learning.
Secondly, children seem to become familiar with the individual units of a morpho-syntactic dependency beforree learning the dependency itself. I investigate how prior familiarity with a/b impacts learning aXb dependencies for adults. Previous findings suggest a negative effect of prior familiarity with a/b, but I find that these results are based on a confound relating to the sequential presentation of two learning phases (learning a/bs, and learning aXb dependencies). Eliminating this confound, I find no significant disadvantage of prior familiarity with a/b.
Finally, I show that adults can generalize a_b dependencies to novel aX’b strings (with unfamiliar X’), but, 18-month-olds show no such generalization. Young learners may only be able to track dependencies in familiar contexts.
Morpho-syntactic dependencies are typically instantiated between functional morphemes (is, -ing), straddling lexical morphemes (gently, kiss). Functional morphemes are often less prosodically prominent than lexical ones. I investigate the role that this prosodic contrast could play in non-adjacent dependency-learning: both adults and infants learn aXb dependencies when a/b are prosodically prominent, but also when they are prosodically weak compared to the intervening X, similar to functional morphemes straddling a lexical word. The prosodic properties of natural languages could thus facilitate non-adjacent dependency learning.
Secondly, children seem to become familiar with the individual units of a morpho-syntactic dependency beforree learning the dependency itself. I investigate how prior familiarity with a/b impacts learning aXb dependencies for adults. Previous findings suggest a negative effect of prior familiarity with a/b, but I find that these results are based on a confound relating to the sequential presentation of two learning phases (learning a/bs, and learning aXb dependencies). Eliminating this confound, I find no significant disadvantage of prior familiarity with a/b.
Finally, I show that adults can generalize a_b dependencies to novel aX’b strings (with unfamiliar X’), but, 18-month-olds show no such generalization. Young learners may only be able to track dependencies in familiar contexts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Awarding Institution |
|
Supervisors/Advisors |
|
Award date | 16 Jun 2017 |
Publisher | |
Print ISBNs | 978-94-6093-236-6 |
Publication status | Published - 16 Jun 2017 |
Keywords
- non-adjacent dependencies
- infant
- artificial grammar
- statistical learning
- prosodic cues
- starting small