Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Leadership behaviour repertoires in public organizations

  • Leiden University

Research output: ThesisDoctoral thesis 4 (Research NOT UU / Graduation NOT UU)

Abstract

Widespread developments in organizing affect how leadership is embedded in public organizations. The link between leadership and formal positions in the hierarchy becomes less straightforward, since collaboration across organizational boundaries and flexible arrangements parallel to bureaucratic structures are increasingly common. Leadership is further complicated by the typical reality of unclear or competing goals, tasks, and stakeholder interests. Since navigating in such an ambiguous and complex context often requires a variety of leadership behaviours, this dissertation introduces a comprehensive perspective on leadership as a repertoire of behavioural options. Based on four empirical studies, this dissertation examines how leadership behaviour repertoires take shape in public organizations. By adopting a repertoire perspective, this dissertation underlines that leadership behaviour takes on many forms and is used in a variety of directions in relation to multiple stakeholders – by both managers and non-managerial employees – and indicates that use of the leadership behaviour repertoire can be explained by variation in situations, organizational context, and individual attitudes and experiences. These insights contribute to contemporary challenges for leadership in public organizations in theory and practice.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • Leiden University
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Groeneveld, Sandra, Primary supervisor, External person
  • Beerkens, Maarja, Co-supervisor, External person
  • Kuipers, Ben S., Co-supervisor, External person
Award date9 Mar 2023
Publisher
Print ISBNs9789463617741
Publication statusPublished - 9 Mar 2023
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leadership behaviour repertoires in public organizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this