TY - JOUR
T1 - Lateral Eye Movements Do Not Increase False-Memory Rates
T2 - A Failed Direct-Replication Study
AU - van Schie, Kevin
AU - Leer, Arne
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - In this direct replication of Houben, Otgaar, Roelofs, and Merckelbach (Clinical Psychological Science, 6, 610–616, 2018), we tested whether making eye movements during memory recall increases susceptibility to creating false memories. Undergraduates (N = 206) watched a video of a car crash, after which they recalled the video with or without simultaneously making eye movements. Next, participants received misinformation about the video. Finally, during the critical test, they were questioned about video details. The results showed that making eye movements did not increase endorsement of misinformation (i.e., false memory), nor did it reduce (correct) memory details or memory vividness and emotionality. Random variation in sampling or measurement, low reliability of the test instrument, and observer-expectancy effects may explain discrepancies between study effects. Only multiple direct replications by different (independent) laboratories with standardized instruments will allow for assessing whether the effect is robust and largely independent of random variation and moderators.
AB - In this direct replication of Houben, Otgaar, Roelofs, and Merckelbach (Clinical Psychological Science, 6, 610–616, 2018), we tested whether making eye movements during memory recall increases susceptibility to creating false memories. Undergraduates (N = 206) watched a video of a car crash, after which they recalled the video with or without simultaneously making eye movements. Next, participants received misinformation about the video. Finally, during the critical test, they were questioned about video details. The results showed that making eye movements did not increase endorsement of misinformation (i.e., false memory), nor did it reduce (correct) memory details or memory vividness and emotionality. Random variation in sampling or measurement, low reliability of the test instrument, and observer-expectancy effects may explain discrepancies between study effects. Only multiple direct replications by different (independent) laboratories with standardized instruments will allow for assessing whether the effect is robust and largely independent of random variation and moderators.
KW - EMDR
KW - eye movement desensitization and reprocessing
KW - eyewitness testimony
KW - false memory
KW - memory performance
KW - open data
KW - open materials
KW - PTSD
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070447983&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2167702619859335
DO - 10.1177/2167702619859335
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85070447983
SN - 2167-7026
VL - 7
SP - 1159
EP - 1167
JO - Clinical Psychological Science
JF - Clinical Psychological Science
IS - 5
ER -