Later but Not Weaker: Neural Categorization of Native Vowels of Children at Familial Risk of Dyslexia

Ao Chen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Although allophonic speech processing has been hypothesized to be a contributing factor in developmental dyslexia, experimental evidence is limited and inconsistent. The current study compared the categorization of native similar sounding vowels of typically developing (TD) children and children at familial risk (FR) of dyslexia. EEG response was collected in a non-attentive passive oddball paradigm from 35 TD and 35 FR Dutch 20-month-old infants who were matched on vocabu-lary. The children were presented with two nonwords “giep” [Gip] and “gip” [GIp] that contrasted solely with respect to the vowel. In the multiple-speaker condition, both nonwords were produced by twelve different speakers while in the single-speaker condition, single tokens of each word were used as stimuli. For both conditions and for both groups, infant positive mismatch response (p-MMR) was elicited, and the p-MMR amplitude was comparable between the two groups, although the FR children had a later p-MMR peak than the TD children in the multiple-speaker condition. These findings indicate that FR children are able to categorize speech sounds, but that they may do so in a more effortful way than TDs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number412
JournalBrain Sciences
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

  • familial risk of dyslexia
  • infants
  • mismatch negativity
  • phonological categorization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Later but Not Weaker: Neural Categorization of Native Vowels of Children at Familial Risk of Dyslexia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this