Abstract
Observations and theory presented in a paper by Nieuwstadt are reviewed and reconsidered. We have used a large eddy simulation (LES) model to make a 10-h rerun. Averaged results obtained for the last hour were considered to be representative for the wind-driven, quasi steady nocturnal boundary layer as reported in Nieuwstadt's paper.
| Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 235-249 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Flow, Turbulence and Combustion |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |