TY - JOUR
T1 - Knowledge co-production in protective spaces
T2 - case studies of two climate adaptation projects
AU - Boon, Wouter P.C.
AU - Hessels, Laurens K.
AU - Horlings, Edwin
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Knowledge co-production, a mode of research including contributions both from academic and non-academic actors, is a promising approach for climate adaptation research in order to produce knowledge that supports the development of local and regional adaptation policies. However, such a local and practical focus may be ill-aligned with the global ambitions of academic participants. The differences between performance criteria of academic and non-academic partners make knowledge co-production unlikely to emerge and survive without protection. This paper aims to understand how different participants in knowledge co-production for climate adaptation can be protected from the norms, values, and performance criteria of their own respective organizations and communities. We found that combinations of shielding (moderating pressures from the selection environment), nurturing (supporting knowledge development), and empowerment (increasing influence over the contexts) activities lead to more successful knowledge co-production. Moreover, our analysis shows that there is no silver bullet for the protection of knowledge co-production. An effective protection strategy should be tailored to the research problem and the social network of a given program.
AB - Knowledge co-production, a mode of research including contributions both from academic and non-academic actors, is a promising approach for climate adaptation research in order to produce knowledge that supports the development of local and regional adaptation policies. However, such a local and practical focus may be ill-aligned with the global ambitions of academic participants. The differences between performance criteria of academic and non-academic partners make knowledge co-production unlikely to emerge and survive without protection. This paper aims to understand how different participants in knowledge co-production for climate adaptation can be protected from the norms, values, and performance criteria of their own respective organizations and communities. We found that combinations of shielding (moderating pressures from the selection environment), nurturing (supporting knowledge development), and empowerment (increasing influence over the contexts) activities lead to more successful knowledge co-production. Moreover, our analysis shows that there is no silver bullet for the protection of knowledge co-production. An effective protection strategy should be tailored to the research problem and the social network of a given program.
KW - Climate adaptation
KW - Knowledge co-production
KW - Protective spaces
KW - Transdisciplinarity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85067804348
U2 - 10.1007/s10113-019-01517-4
DO - 10.1007/s10113-019-01517-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85067804348
SN - 1436-3798
VL - 19
SP - 1935
EP - 1947
JO - Regional Environmental Change
JF - Regional Environmental Change
IS - 7
ER -