Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Kantian political philosophy, coercion, and public health

  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Many public health policies are coercive and therefore, they require moral justification. Kantian political philosophy is an under-explored but appealing approach to public health ethics. According to the Kantian approach, which is centred around freedom as independence, the state has an important role in protecting that freedom. In doing so, the state is justified to use coercion. To illustrate the Kantian approach, we consider its implications in the context of coercive vaccination policy. We show coercive vaccination policies are justified, because the state is needed to provide determinacy, because such policies are needed to guarantee the systematic enjoyment of the right to freedom, and because such policies reduce the risk for dependence on others.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-249
Number of pages21
JournalMonash bioethics review
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Coercion
  • Freedom
  • Kantian political philosophy
  • Public health
  • Vaccination

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Kantian political philosophy, coercion, and public health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this