Abstract
Many public health policies are coercive and therefore, they require moral justification. Kantian political philosophy is an under-explored but appealing approach to public health ethics. According to the Kantian approach, which is centred around freedom as independence, the state has an important role in protecting that freedom. In doing so, the state is justified to use coercion. To illustrate the Kantian approach, we consider its implications in the context of coercive vaccination policy. We show coercive vaccination policies are justified, because the state is needed to provide determinacy, because such policies are needed to guarantee the systematic enjoyment of the right to freedom, and because such policies reduce the risk for dependence on others.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 229-249 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Monash bioethics review |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2025.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Coercion
- Freedom
- Kantian political philosophy
- Public health
- Vaccination
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Kantian political philosophy, coercion, and public health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver